Chess Pieces on a Chessboard

Tax Audits of Cash Intensive Businesses

Cash intensive businesses are a prime target for tax examinations because they receive a significant amount of receipts in cash, which are more difficult to trace. Cash intensive businesses include restaurants, grocery stores, and gas stations. They also include businesses like construction and trucking companies that tend to pay independent contractors in cash. Due to the elusive nature of cash, the IRS has prepared an Audit Technique Guide (ATG) that explains to IRS examiners how to audit a cash intensive business.

Minimum Income Probes

According to the ATG, unreported income is one of the main issues the IRS has identified when auditing cash intensive businesses. Therefore, the ATG instructs auditors to conduct minimum income probes to determine whether a taxpayer accurately reported income. Minimum income probes include the following:

  • An analysis of the financial status of a taxpayer to determine whether the reported income is sufficient to support the taxpayer’s lifestyle. If an expense is not disclosed on a tax return, the IRS uses Bureau of Labor Statistics information to estimate personal living expenses.
  • An interview of the taxpayer. The ATG explains interviews are very important especially when auditing cash intensive businesses due to the lack of tangible records.
  • A tour of the business to observe how the business operates and the type of payments received. The ATG informs IRS auditors that some owners of cash intensive businesses will reduce prices when they learn their business will be audited. Therefore, the IRS examiner may record the prices of some items during the tour.
  • An evaluation of the taxpayer’s policies and procedures for gathering and maintaining accurate financial information.
  • A reconciliation of income to books and records by duplicating the taxpayer’s steps for calculating income.
  • An analysis of the taxpayer’s business and personal bank accounts, including investment accounts.
  • A horizontal business ratio analysis which identifies changes in items such as sales, cost of goods sold, expenses, and net income over time. The IRS considers a difference of 5% or more to be significant enough to merit further inquiry.
  • A vertical business ratio analysis that identifies differences between a taxpayer’s business and the industry standards for a particular year. The IRS uses this comparison to determine whether the taxpayer’s reported gross receipts and net profit are reasonable according to the IRS’ information on the industry.
Examination Techniques for a Cash Intensive Business

The ATG emphasizes to IRS examiners the importance of interviewing the taxpayer. It explains that the taxpayer’s oral testimony may be the only evidence provided because cash intensive businesses tend to have few physical records. IRS auditors are informed that the interviews should be as thorough as possible and may take at least two hours. Taxpayers generally must be present during the interview and tour of the business. However, taxpayers who do not want to speak with an IRS examiner may appoint qualified representatives like the tax attorneys at the Ben-Cohen Law Firm to handle every aspect of the tax audit.

Taxpayers should be aware that the IRS has the authority to issue summons to third-parties, like banks and accountants, who may have records that are relevant to the audit. The IRS also has access to information held by other government agencies. Such sources may help an IRS auditor corroborate or refute information gathered from a taxpayer or a taxpayer’s representative. For example, if a taxpayer claims over $10,000 of cash is not income but a gift or loan from a relative overseas, the IRS agent may corroborate this information by searching through the government’s database for a FinCEN Form 105. FinCEN Form 105 must be filed by anyone who transports monetary instruments of more than $10,000 in or out of the U.S. Failure to file a FinCEN Form 105 may result in a fine of up to $500,000 and/or imprisonment of not more than ten years. In addition, any money that should have been reported on FinCEN Form 105 may be seized by the government. Therefore, taxpayers may want to consider retaining a tax attorney or CPA who knows how one piece of information is connected to another, and to manage the flow of information provided to the IRS.

As most IRS examiners may be unaware of how a certain business operates, the ATG provides additional information on the following relatively prevalent cash intensive businesses and common audit issues related to each:

  • Bail Bonds: The ATG explains that IRS auditors should examine build up fund accounts for unreported income, premium income, reimbursed expenses, double deductions due to payments made from build up fund accounts, and deducted bond costs that should have been slowly amortized over time.
  • Beauty Shops: IRS agents are instructed to check income earned from services, sale of products, and station rental income from stylists who are independent contractors.
  • Car Wash: As cash intensive businesses tend to have few financial records, IRS agents must rely on indirect methods to test income. One of the indirect methods used by IRS agents is analyzing expenses to reconstruct potential income. With respect to a car wash business, an IRS auditor may measure the amount of water, soap, and chemicals used to determine how many cars were washed.
  • Convenience Stores, Mini-Marts and Bodegas: The ATG directs IRS examiners to review money orders and money transfer systems like Western Union as some unrecorded cash may be used to purchase money orders. IRS examiners are also instructed to check for self-consumed items as they are often unreported in the books.
  • Laundromats: If a laundromat has no books and records, the ATG directs IRS auditors to reconstruct income by measuring the water, electricity, and gas consumption of the business.
  • Scrap Metal: According to the ATG, two of the main issues in the scrap metal industry is unreported income and substantiation of purchases. Taxpayers should be aware that the adequacy of their documents substantiating their purchases is incredibly important. In Bobry v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-27, the taxpayer provided receipts showing unit cost, total cost, metal type, and weight of scrap metal received as substantiation for cash purchases. The IRS still disallowed 83% of these cash purchases because the taxpayer did not provide the identities of who the taxpayer purchased the metal from. The Tax Court disagreed with disallowing 83%, but still denied 5% of taxpayer’s cash purchases deductions for inadequate substantiation. In addition, the taxpayer was subject to a 20% accuracy-related penalty for any underpayments that resulted from the disallowance.
  • Taxicabs: The IRS developed a formula called the taxi/cab formula to reconstruct gross receipts of taxicab drivers. The cab formula involves the following steps:
    • First, calculate the total amount a taxicab driver earns for entry by multiplying the average number of customers per day by the number of days per year the driver works and by the driver’s entry rate. This is the driver’s total earned entry amount.
    • Second, divide total fuel expense by the average cost per gallon to obtain the number of gallons used.
    • Third, multiply the number of gallons used by the vehicle miles per gallon to calculate the total miles driven. Subtract non-business miles from this total to obtain the total business miles driven.
    • Fourth, multiply the total business miles driven by the rate the driver charges per mile.
    • Fifth, add to the total from step four the total earned entry amount (from step one), tips and lease income, and any other income like wait time to calculate the total gross receipts.

IRS audits of cash intensive businesses can be burdensome, and subject taxpayers to severe civil and criminal penalties. Pedram Ben-Cohen, Esq., CPA knows how to defend against the IRS’ audit tactics as he has represented taxpayers against government taxing authorities for over 20 years. He is also a Taxation Law Specialist certified by the State Bar of California. Contact us now to schedule an appointment with Mr. Ben-Cohen.

Client Reviews
I approached Mr. Ben-Cohen regarding a pending case with the State of California and my small business. During a time that was quite stressful, I found Mr. Ben-Cohen to be the perfect person to represent me and my company. He communicated with me in clear terms so that I understood everything that was taking place in a timely manner. He treated my situation with the type of candor you only find in a consummate professional and successfully negotiated a deal with the State of California that far exceeded my expectations. I found him to be kind, efficient, sensitive and nothing short of brilliant. I consider myself fortunate to have met him and highly recommend his services. I will not hesitate to use his firm in the future should a need arise. Google, We Care Spa
I am an international tax advisor and have worked with Pedram on more than a dozen difficult and challenging cases. Pedram's clients and fellow advisors highly respect him because he has an uncanny ability to quickly identify and work diligently to resolve his clients' issues. Pedram is pragmatic in his approach. He is transparent with his clients and dedicated to getting to a fair and reasonable outcome. I have attended an IRS Appeals conference with Pedram and would want no other attorney on my side. Pedram is extremely passionate in his work and representing his clients. He is also enjoyable to work with and develops very good relationships with his clients and fellow advisors. I highly recommend Pedram for any tax controversy work. Avvo, Curt
Top Drawer Tax Fraud Lawyer. Pedram got me out a CI jam I thought I would not resolve. He is also fair and reasonable with his billing. I interviewed 4 top Tax Fraud Lawyers in LA and went with Pedram...Glad I did! Google, Michael Jeppson
Pedram Ben-Cohen at Ben-Cohen Law Firm, PLC is one of the most incredible, creative, and caring attorneys I have ever dealt with. He gave us hope but also gave us the reality and worst case scenario. He fought for us tooth and nail. The attention and time Pedram put into the case was like no other. He charged us more than fair and was very reasonable in every aspect. He is not the kind of attorney that charges for every minute. I liked him very much not only as an attorney but as a person because he is very honest, is true to his integrity, and is dedicated to his clients. He loves what he does and has the passion to protect and defend his clients, which totally shows in his work and our outcome. We originally hired another attorney from a famous firm who basically did not give us much hope on our case . That is when we came to Pedram who won our case in a short amount of time and got us the outcome we were looking for. Because of Pedram and his creativeness, willingness, and dedication, he got us our favorable outcome. He is our go to attorney for sure, without a doubt. Avvo, Anonymous
A few years ago I had a major tax problem and I was looking for the right professional tax lawyer. I interviewed at least five experts and all of them were very professional. I am very picky. When I met Mr. Pedram Ben-Cohen, it took me no more than five minutes to decide that he was the one, and I was absolutely right with my intuition. He is very professional, knowledgeable, smart, and knows his job perfectly. In addition to all of his professional skills, as a person he is very friendly, pleasant, ready to help, and took care of me like I was his own family. I referred and recommended him to friends and family with tax problems and will continue to do so warmly to anyone. I know that he is able and will do his job the best way for his clients. He is my personal tax lawyer and expert and will remain so. Google, Shlomo Kattan
Contact Us
Contact form